It’s enough to make strong men weep. A 91 year old man living with his cat Fluffy was forcibly removed from his home where he had lived for over 50 years and locked in a dementia unit against his wishes by his caring social services of Essex Council.  And to add insult to injury, Essex Council had the temerity to charge him £25,000 for the privilege.

Fortunately for him, but not before 18 months of incarceration, his friend raised the alarm and he was rescued.  The judge who heard the case was scathing in his criticism of the Council’s conduct, which they sought to justify to the bitter end.  The elderly gentleman’s pleas to be allowed to return home fell on deaf ears, giving rise to a comment from the judge that the Council’s conduct was nothing short of reprehensible.  Whilst at the age of 91, being incarcerated for 18 months must have seemed an eternity, the Council was required to pay him £60,000 in damages, which no doubt will come out of their budget as provided by the taxpayer.  The sad reality is that nobody on the Council was prepared to take any of the blame, as in their book, there was no blame to take.

Over the years, I have done my best to defend Social Services from their catatonic mistakes on the basis they they have to make decisions that will affect the welfare of many in their care.  You will remember not so long ago the catalogue of mistakes relating to vulnerable children, where Social Services failed to act despite the clearest warning signs, and the children died horrible deaths.  In their defence, such as it was, they saw nothing to arouse their suspicions.  It beggars belief.

The good news for those of us nudging at the margins of advancing years is that the Social Services cannot simply walk into our homes and march us off to the twilight home for the bewildered. They need a court order, and we are entitled to be legally represented and to be heard.  So if some Gauleiter comes knocking at your door, tell her to get stuffed with my compliments. As somebody once said: “Don’t let the buggers get you down!”

Published by


David is an English barrister, writer, public performer and keynote speaker. His full profile can be found on his website.

3 thoughts on “IT BEGGARS BELIEF”

  1. David, sorry to say but this has been going on for years in some shady form or other, as has the situation with prosecution witnesses sitting together outside a courtroom discussing what went on in a cross examination before another one of them is called. This is surely an abuse of process and any barrister worth his salt should be calling for a mis-trial as soon as something like this is discovered. I can speak from experience about the latter situation having suffered at the hands of Sussex Police (as corrupt a bunch as you can get) as the police witnesses shaped their evidence and changed it according to the current proceedings.

    It would be laughable if it wasn’t so serious. But in all honesty the real problem is not the CPS but our inherently corrupt police service ensuring that a conviction is secured no matter the facts or truth.

  2. I believe that is among the most vital info for me.
    And i’m satisfied studying your article. But wanna commentary on few common issues, The
    site style is ideal, the articles is actually excellent : D.
    Just right process, cheers

Leave a Reply to Kitchen Worktops in Reading Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.